![]() ![]() I think Fields is better than he has shown and could do well elsewhere. Ultimately, if the Giants have a guy in mind, go get him. In comment 16296771 LauderdaleMatty said: Quote: Cant keep rolling with older vets that arent that good. I think the 2nd pick in round 2 should utilize on a guard. But I wouldnt trade down more than 6-7 spots. Thats who we should covet in any trade down and then look for our WR. ![]() Someone may trade up a few spots for Fashnu or Alt. I'm fine with a cluster draft approach on days two and three to keep firing away at the OL, but they just cannot keep spending ultra-premium draft resources on the same position in such a short period of time when the entire roster has a talent gap. What I'm definitely NOT doing is burning a third top-10 pick on OL. I'd probably take Turner or Latu and then start working the phones to get into a spot between 25-32 to take a QB in the next tier (Nix would probably be the next one for me after the top three, but there's a few in that next group), and have the 5th year option available for that prospect. I think this scenario would leave the Giants stuck at #5. What prospect is someone emptying their warchest for at #5 if the top four go as the OP suggests? ![]() If those four are all gone, there may not be a robust market for a trade down. In comment 16296783 Gatorade Dunk said: Quote: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |